Ceiling mount thoughts

Have the central core suspended on a rod with some bearings. Put the motor on the outside of the “base” turning it like a big gear. This will give me a lot more support for the weight I think. Maybe look at an adjustable counterbalance, read as the upper arm would have a rail that a weight would run on to offset the force on the other end of the arm. This will probably also help keep the power minimized in the neutral position if I want it to be retracted. If the arm is heavy enough, and with enough dampeners, I could just move the whole your arm on that pivot by adjusting the counterbalance’s position. I need to measure the room to figure out the range I need. I’d like it to be able to reach the far end of the book case to my work table. That might be a stupid want, but I never claimed to think things all the way through before talking a lot of shit. I’m kinda thinking for the elbow to do a spinnig rod driving an offset joint. None of what I’m saying is particularly accurate for serious people terms. I’m not serious.

I did those things I talked about previously. Badly but done. I’ve also started writing up the process for how I’m doing an install by respond the same steps for another SD card.

I also had some plumbing changes today, so I placed an order for some stuff, but I wanted it with free same day, so… I have no self control. I have amongst the things I needed, two stepper motors and five drivers.

This of course means I’m working on things a bit faster than I usually like. You know, doing rather than talking.

My concern is starting to be the weight and torque of what I’m thinking about. Within reason, anything that is on the ceiling mount itself is effectively weightless. Anything on the arm though is going to be multiplied in the bad way by the length of the arm. That could be an issue. I see a couple paths forward. I’m going to remove the possibility of a shorter arm, no retreat, no step back. With that being said, I either need to make the arm stronger or reduce the forces. I’m cheap, no unobtanium for me, so it’s looking like I need to reduce the weight on the end of that arm. I’m thinking Bowden tubes, because they’re my solution to everything. I could also look at using timing belts to the same effect, but if then have to build in a lot of other stuff. Every time an arm moved, it wild change the tension on the other belts, so I’d have to do something like retract motor a if motor b extended. This isn’t a have killer, but something I have to keep in mind. I wonder if this would be a good use case for an FPGA. I could just look at doing this like an adult, with motors all the way down, but even the human body doesn’t do that. Hydraulics? On the ceiling? No thanks.

I suppose the first step, past base software install, is build an arm bracket that I could use to study the arm at a good working height from, and then start building an arm. Without doing a lot of math and research into materials, I won’t know the exact forces at play, so maybe I should just experiment with the forces at play.

I’m also continuing the evolution on my thought on counterbalances and the kinematics. Let’s say I have an arm with a 10′ reach, with 5′ on the upper. This means I gave an arm that’s going to have a hard time ever extending unless it’s doing some work looking double jointed action due to height of the ceiling. This is why I sometimes scoff at people going all biomimicry. I could have the arm, mounted on the central point not by a joint, but a slot. On the back end of the arm, I could throw on some ceiling rolling wheels.

Ceiling wheels – yes; bowden tubes – no, maybe, I’m thinking. I could look at a gravity tensioned cable drive for the arm. The gripper should probably it’s own motors, just the speed factor and grip force. I guess I could look at doing gravity tension all around. I still might look at Bowden tubes just for the cleanliness of the lines. That and so I don’t end up with dirt wearing down the cables. If I go with a cable drive that’s where I’ll want to look at some fat DC motors with a bit of homebrew encoding.

First build a test plate. Then start tests. I don’t need to design a chariot before before building a wheel.

Tesselated set of ceiling rails? Slots that support the weight with legs giving reasonably 2-dimensional freedom, and a crane system for the Z? Ceiling mounted almost polar coordinate system?

Further thoughts

  • Multiple depths?
  • Any particular pattern of row heights?
  • Screw row heights and go with a box method?
  • Haphazard boxes, purpose built or aesthetic built?
  • Painted, stained, or raw wood?
  • Facing, or whatever it’s called when you have with trim for to the edge of plywood, as in I’m not sure if facing is the word I want and I don’t want to look it up?
  • Power integral to the shelves or not?
  • Have an area for the computer? A spare file server?
  • Shelves on door hinges to double up paperbacks?
  • Get back into building the book train idea for the paperbacks? (I had a coworker remind me about that)
  • How much load is this going to as to the wall?
  • Oh yeah… What bling? Lights, integrated speakers, bronze inlays, relief carvings, motorized rails? You know, bling.

Progress was made

I got far enough into the den to find my carboy, so later this week is Brew Day. It also made be think though, “I need to get rid of this crap”. So a bit of a plan.

  • Desolder all the things. There’s a lot of them, and most of them aren’t needed.
  • Take the closet doors off. They’re not helping, and they take space to open. At a later point they might be replaced with a book shelf secret door. Of course, it should be obvious to anyone, but whatever.
  • Shelves in the garage. This will take a Home Despot run. Probably cheap 1×8 and brackets. I might be able to start with just brackets and use up more of my pallet junk.
  • Start getting rid of the stupid wire racks that I hate so much. Or put them in the crawlspace for deeper storage?
  • Centrally move my worktable. I want to be able to work on multiple sides. Also, putty the living daylights out of it. Come on Peter, rough cut is neat, but a pain to work on. Either putty or some other flattening option.
  • More shelves on the far wall. I think these ones will need to be custom though as I want them to house all sorts of goodness. Beer brewing. Sewing machine. Kegerator? Soldering station. Etc. Cabinet doors wouldn’t be a bad idea either. Another run or three to the Despot. I should relook at Becky Stearns’ video about they plywood shelving.
  • Window box for plants. Inside.
  • Start trimming the bulk metal from my desk. Or incorporate my desk into the sleeves and recycle the hunk of junk.
  • What’s under the carpet? Can I talk the carpet and get to work, or do I need to do a lot before it could be functional?

Further

Put the contents of the boxes, which are going to have to be square if not cubes, in circles. This way…

Wait. They’ll have to be circles in circles. Linkage between to keep the spacing. Inside each circle is a free wheeling circle. The circles will have bearing mounts on the (back? sides?). The fronts will have linkage to their neighbors. I think this will work. Power will still be an issue. That and volume. Did I save space?

I think this idea still needs work.

I’m also not all about the idea itself. Not the rails. Not the motion. Not the mechanics.

I think I just like the idea of reduced footprint. I could do a reduced footprint to a much lesser scale with a chain hoist. Seeing as how my operating height, assuming a standing position is about 3.5 -5.5 feet, then I could have three units that too up the space needs of one.

It’s an idea.

Safety dance

I’m drinking right now, but really this weekend I started making my stuff safer. I’m crimping connectors, adding strain relief, and strapping shit down on the printer. Later this weekend, probably tomorrow, I’ll get the Den cleaned out enough to find my carboy. This is kinda important as I have my GigaPot showing up and then it’s beer! time.

Forgot to publish.

The fatal flaw

Everything I’ve described makes the bot fragile. Between two dogs and a cat, that’s not gonna work. I’ll definitely, probably, finish the modelling and design anyway as an educational experience. Building it would be wicked to.

But it may never go into production.

I still remember my idea

Yay! It also happened just in time for the Hackaday prize, so I might flesh it out and post there. Might is always a very operative word. One of the things that makes this much more mighty than musty is that I’ve already got on a couple issues, one that reduces the viability for the specific application, one that affects all applications, and one that affects all applications, but the specific.

  • Since the initial robot these would be mounted on required only two wheels, with the third/fourth point of contact being the broom head, we’ve now added two wheels, and (a minimum*) of four motors (two drive and to elevators).
  • Rise and run (I forget the fact term they use, it’s not slope though I think) of American standard stairs is steep enough that I need more elevating than the length of the robot. That means I need to go either with a crossed pattern of the pinioned rods getting me a bit more elevating, and I honestly don’t know if this will work but I do know it just added complexity, or a wider robot and having the rods turn out across the robot rather than along it, with either four elevating motors or much more build complexity.
  • The initial concept requires the broom head to act as the chin I so typically will use while climbing. Finger tips, chin, elbow, elbow, rib cage, dead fish flop. This isn’t a game killer, but it means that any robot would require an anchor like a broom head or rubber foot. Oh yeah, and going backwards has the same requirement or a literally reversed maneuver, as in rear first down the stairs.

But other than that, I think it’s a wicked idea. I should at least do up some drawings. It’s also be a great one to be an overly complex project to use as training for how to do multiple moving parts in Fusion 360, to get free up with my own lack of knowledge and overall act as a counter intuitive example of far-of-failure.

By the power of metal skull, the failure is mine!

Of the cuff, it’s potentially a new slogan concept. I don’t like the metal thang. Also, I’m not sure if that’s still too on the nose for comfort. I’m pretty sure I don’t want to get worked over by some silly trademark case. Oh well, it was a fun one liner while it lasted. Now it’s a fun one strike-througher